40% OFF
Monthly review findings and trader experiences.
Reviews analysed
311
Aug 1, 2026 to Aug 31, 2026
Average rating
4.55
+0.39 points vs July 2026
Detailed experiences
69.5%
Of 311 reviews published this month
Mentioned an issue
43.5%
Of reviews describing a detailed experience
Monthly review brief
Reviews this month are strongly favorable. Traders describe withdrawals that arrive fast and support that fixes billing and setup mistakes. The caution sits in account access, losses blamed on the platform, and PRO+ transitions: a smooth routine experience says nothing about how a contested case ends.
What traders said worked
Issues reviewers mention
This report describes reviews published during the reporting month, not necessarily events occurring then. Allegations, payout amounts and timing are reviewer-reported and unaudited. Generic praise provides limited experiential evidence, and company replies alone do not establish resolution.
Open a finding for the reported experience and its source reviews.
Positive findings from this month's report.
Reviewers describe fast first and repeat payouts
RecurringSpecific accounts describe successful first withdrawals and repeat receipts, sometimes arriving shortly after approval. Wallet credits, payment processing and receipt in a personal account are distinct milestones and should not be treated as interchangeable.
My first payout from TPT. Very fast.
Why this review is included: Explicit first-payout experience rather than generic praise.
What it supports: Successful first withdrawal with unspecified fast timing.
Read the review at the sourceAmazing company! I get paid every single day.
Why this review is included: Describes repeated personal receipts.
What it supports: Repeat payout experience.
Read the review at the sourceI got my daily payout 3 times this week.
Why this review is included: Concrete repeated-payout claim.
What it supports: Recurring access to payouts.
Read the review at the sourceTook my First Payout. It was there in minutes.
Why this review is included: Connects first payout with receipt timing.
What it supports: Rapid first-payout receipt.
Read the review at the sourceThe wallet is valued for separating profits from trading
RecurringReviewers praise easy wallet transfers and the ability to set profits aside. Some describe this as useful for budgeting or protecting already-transferred earnings from subsequent trading-account losses; these are reviewer descriptions, not independently verified contractual guarantees.
Payments are transferred to the wallet easily
Why this review is included: Directly identifies the wallet-transfer experience.
What it supports: Ease of moving profits into the wallet.
Read the review at the sourceMoves to wallet instantly !
Why this review is included: A brief corroborating wallet-speed statement, with limited experiential detail.
What it supports: Wallet speed is a recognizable praise theme, distinct from bank receipt.
Read the review at the sourceSupport often corrected missed discounts and customer mistakes
RecurringDetailed reviews describe retrospective coupon application, activation-fee refunds, restored evaluation progress and reset credits. These favorable outcomes frequently followed an initial billing, credit or user-error problem rather than an entirely frictionless purchase.
She quickly checked my account, applied the missing promo code, and processed the refund hassle-free.
Why this review is included: Specifies both the problem and the corrective actions.
What it supports: Missing promotion corrected with a refund.
Read the review at the sourceShe was able to issue me a reset credit and transfer the balance and trading day to the new account.
Why this review is included: Describes restoration of evaluation progress, not just courteous contact.
What it supports: Support remedied an accidental reset.
Read the review at the sourceThe subscription of my account failed to cancel after passing the test, and you ended up been charged on the renewal. After contacting the support, the refund has been paid within days.
Why this review is included: Customer confirms refund receipt after a renewal problem.
What it supports: A reported subscription-charge problem ended in compensation.
Read the review at the sourceHuman agents supplied useful setup fixes and explanations
RecurringReviewers describe agents resolving connection problems, supplying activation credits and explaining remaining qualification steps. Chatbot handoffs sometimes worked well, although other reviews distinguish successful human help from unsuccessful automated responses.
There was a delay in moving 2 out of 5 passed test accounts to PRO. I requested a live agent in the support chat and Ricardo got my remaining 2 accounts migrated to PRO within 5 minutes.
Why this review is included: Reports a defined activation delay and completed remedy.
What it supports: Human support restored progression into PRO.
Read the review at the sourcehad some connecting issues with a new account. Pam fixed it in seconds.
Why this review is included: Concise, specific connection-resolution account.
What it supports: Rapid technical setup assistance.
Read the review at the sourceClear requirements and successful progression remain positive themes
RecurringReviewers describe understandable evaluation and trading rules, smooth transitions into funded accounts and a welcome shortening of evaluation requirements. Positive descriptions of rule clarity coexist with disputes about enforcement and later account placement.
My first payout from TPT. Very fast. Trading rules are clear and reward traders over gamblers.
Why this review is included: Links rule clarity to an identifiable payout experience.
What it supports: Positive appraisal of trading rules from a payout recipient.
Read the review at the sourceAlways a good experience, clear and fair rules with full transparency.
Why this review is included: Expressly identifies clarity and fairness, although with limited detail.
What it supports: Rule clarity is a recognizable praise theme.
Read the review at the sourceReported problems and what happened next.
Missing discount codes and slow funded-account activation
RecurringMissing discounts or activation credits recur in reviews, often followed by a successful support correction. Other reviewers report waiting for dashboard updates, manual reviews or activation without a confirmed completion. A reward-program complaint separately disputes the value and explanation of an activation fee.
Had an issue with my credit bank not populating the credit to activate my PRO account.
Why this review is included: Identifies the specific credit-to-activation failure.
What it supports: Activation-credit friction.
Read the review at the sourceWorst support ever had. Bought the account with coupon code that waive the activation fee. After I passed and go to activate it. There is no credit which waive the activation fee as they said.
Why this review is included: Describes a purchased promotion and missing promised credit.
What it supports: An unresolved activation-credit complaint.
Read the review at the sourceso my experience with them is that they are very slow in response on the chat. The eval accounts take long to get validated once you pass them.
Why this review is included: Connects slow assistance with delayed post-evaluation validation.
What it supports: Activation delays are not limited to coupon problems.
Read the review at the sourceSubscriptions charged after cancellation
RecurringReviewers report unwanted subscription renewals, including cases refunded after support contact. Another reviewer alleges a debit after cancellation followed by an account suspension and a dispute fee after a payment-provider claim. The latter account remains a disputed customer allegation, not a verified billing finding.
The subscription of my account failed to cancel after passing the test, and you ended up been charged on the renewal.
Why this review is included: Specifies a renewal charge after the reviewer expected cancellation.
What it supports: Unexpected subscription renewal.
Read the review at the sourceWise and PayPal limits, and fees taken off withdrawals
RecurringInternational reviewers criticize the availability or cost of Wise and PayPal and request alternatives. A separate reviewer reports receiving substantially less than requested after the profit split and withdrawal charges. These complaints concern methods and deductions, not established transfer delays.
Requested daily payout on my $50k sim funded account amount of $179 and after TPT taking 20%, $50 for cashing out under $250, $2 for PayPal. I ended up receiving $96.
Why this review is included: Provides the requested amount, stated deductions and receipt in the customer's own words.
What it supports: A reviewer reports unexpected withdrawal deductions; currency is not established.
Read the review at the sourcePRO+ transfers stall accounts and forfeit profits
RecurringCritical reviews describe slow activation, manual unlocking, market-access restrictions and less favorable PRO+ Development conditions. A reviewer alleges profits were forfeited on immediate transfer. Experiences are not uniformly negative: other reviewers welcome placement, and a detailed appeal reports future placements being returned to PRO.
The wait time and communication while going from PRO to PRO+ was not acceptable for a firm as highly regarded as this one.
Why this review is included: Directly identifies transition timing and communication concerns.
What it supports: PRO-to-PRO+ transition friction.
Read the review at the sourceIve tried to get over the trailing drawdown 7 times, after 7+ accounts blown, and after getting it above the buffer and making $10K on the first day, they INSTANTLY moved me to a pro+ account and forfeited the $10K.
Why this review is included: Explicit allegation connecting forced placement with lost profits.
What it supports: Reviewer-reported profit forfeiture, not an independently established loss.
Read the review at the sourceAccounts closed over alleged multi-account trading
RecurringReviewers dispute closures attributed to opposite positions, differing trading management or shared access. Technical-disruption allegations and an acknowledged manual mistake produce materially different cases. An updated review reports a favorable re-review and promised reinstatement, but does not confirm that reinstatement was completed.
Even though this was a clear manual error with zero intention to hedge or break the rules, both accounts were permanently closed.
Why this review is included: Clearly states the admitted error, disputed intent and reported consequence.
What it supports: A reviewer disputes permanent closure for accidental opposing positions.
Read the review at the sourceThis company closes your profile without giving you an explanation, I have never broken any rules, I never did hedging, and they closed my account anyway
Why this review is included: Captures a customer's denial of a breach without treating it as independently proven.
What it supports: Disputed closure and dissatisfaction with the explanation.
Read the review at the sourceAccounts disabled with no explanation
RecurringSeparate accounts describe allegedly premature liquidation, unexplained disabling, dashboard status mismatches and unanswered reinstatement requests. Some provide little detail about the underlying reason. A payout-denial allegation concerning friends should be distinguished from that reviewer's personal account loss and ban.
Deleted my funded account without any notification.
Why this review is included: Direct customer allegation of unannounced closure.
What it supports: Reported loss of account access.
Read the review at the sourceCustomer support might respond within 2 days it’s never been a fast experience.
Why this review is included: Contrasts with rapid-support praise and accompanies a liquidation complaint.
What it supports: Slow assistance reported in an account-loss dispute.
Read the review at the sourceLagging connections and orders that would not close
RecurringReviewers describe lagging connections, missing or delayed order displays and difficulty controlling positions. Some associate these events with drawdown breaches or lost accounts and say support rejected their explanation. Other reviewers report smooth operation or successful connection fixes, so the evidence does not establish a universal platform failure.
It’s impossible to trade with Rithmic. Rithmic is spamming orders, has a spoofing order problem and it’s lagging.
Why this review is included: Identifies the platform and alleged order behavior.
What it supports: Reviewer-reported Rithmic execution and lag problems.
Read the review at the sourceI had an issue where an order was executed on a funded account that I had no access to (couldn't even see it in tradovate) at the time of execution, and that order resulted in the account hitting trailing drawdown.
Why this review is included: Links access trouble, execution and a stated drawdown consequence.
What it supports: A disputed execution event associated with account loss.
Read the review at the sourceEscalations stuck behind an unhelpful chatbot
RecurringSome reviewers describe unanswered tickets, generic chatbot responses, rejected explanations or difficulty reaching a person. These complaints are especially consequential when paired with account restrictions or trading losses. Successful later escalation is also reported, so initial response and final resolution need separate treatment.
The chatbot "Mira" provided an explanation that is canned, inadequate, and dismissive.
Why this review is included: Names the automated-support failure without inventing the underlying issue.
What it supports: Unhelpful chatbot interaction.
Read the review at the sourceYeah third review, not good, I’m unable to purchase anything, sent and email and nothing
Why this review is included: Connects an unresolved purchase restriction with attempted contact.
What it supports: Communication failure during an access problem.
Read the review at the sourceOne trader blocked at sign-up by failing ID verification
ReportedA prospective customer describes repeated identity-field verification failures and missing phone verification messages before purchasing an account. The reviewer says risk-team follow-up did not solve the problem. These reviews do not establish a recurring KYC pattern or a connection to completed payout checks.
I have filled it out with my real data, and it failed me 3 times.
Why this review is included: Specific personal verification failure rather than a hypothetical complaint.
What it supports: Registration-verification difficulty reported by this reviewer.
Read the review at the sourceIntraday drawdown on unrealized profit catches traders out
RecurringReviewers distinguish clear but challenging drawdown requirements from rules they consider confusing or unsuitable. Criticism includes intraday treatment of unrealized profits and a chatbot explanation alleged to be misleading. These preferences should not be conflated with proof of incorrect enforcement.
Ive tried to get over the trailing drawdown 7 times, after 7+ accounts blown,
Why this review is included: Describes personal repeated difficulty with trailing drawdown.
What it supports: Drawdown can materially affect account survival in reviewer accounts.
Read the review at the sourceReviewer-reported payout experiences. Topic counts can overlap; the most-mentioned appear first.
Mentioned a payout
29.6%
Of all reviews published this month
Described it positively
88.0%
Of reviews that mentioned a payout
Went through cleanly
85
Reviews describing no payout problem
Hit a problem
7
Reviews describing a payout problem
The clearest payment problems are which methods are available internationally, the fees taken off a withdrawal, and what happens to profits during a PRO+ placement. One denial claim is secondhand, about friends. An ordinary first request still pending is not a delay or a denial.
Traders who were paid describe money arriving soon after approval or paperwork; others describe only a fast wallet credit. Speed looks good, but no standard end-to-end commitment appears.
Only methods and amounts reviewers explicitly named.
Amounts described
No amount with an identified currency is available.
The clearest payment problems are which methods are available internationally, the fees taken off a withdrawal, and what happens to profits during a PRO+ placement. One denial claim is secondhand, about friends. An ordinary first request still pending is not a delay or a denial.
| Problem | Reviews | What reviewers described |
|---|---|---|
| alleged denial affecting friends | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| bank connection | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| claimed profit forfeiture on PRO+ transfer | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| international method availability | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Problem | Reviews | What reviewers described |
|---|---|---|
| international method availability and fees | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| profits held during PRO+ Development placement | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| unexpected withdrawal deductions | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
Traders blame method restrictions, fees, required payout steps or where their account was placed. The reviews cannot confirm any of those explanations, and an ambiguous currency symbol is not treated as a known currency.
Most-mentioned topics first. Counts can overlap because a review may mention several rules. See the Rules tab for the rules themselves.
Praise for clear rules sits alongside disputes over opposing positions across accounts, trading a test account differently from a real one, shared access, trailing drawdown and PRO+ placement. One trader admits placing an order on the wrong account but disputes losing it; another got a favorable re-review after a technical incident. None of this proves enforcement is consistent or inconsistent.
| What was disputed | Reviews | Consequence described | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| activation fee on reward-points test account | 1 | unexpected future $130 fee made reward seem poor value | funding |
| closure despite denying rule breaches or hedging | 1 | profile and account closed without satisfactory explanation | trading |
| different trading management in test and real accounts | 1 | accounts cancelled by email | trading |
| discretionary cancellation during PRO+ Development hold | 1 | accounts cancelled before activation | move_to_live |
| What was disputed | Reviews | Consequence described | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| dispute fee after payment-provider claim | 1 | trading account suspended and $50 demanded to unblock it | dispute_resolution |
| immediate PRO+ transfer and profit treatment | 1 | $10K reportedly forfeited | move_to_live |
| multi-account violations despite copier latency or platform behavior | 1 | funded accounts and profits reportedly lost | trading |
| news trading prohibited | 1 | wants news trading permitted | trading |
| No Counter-Positions Rule during technical disruption | 1 | accounts permanently disabled; later reinstatement promised after review | trading |
| PRO+ Development limits, profit hold and fees | 1 | reduced limits, higher commissions and data costs, slow setup | move_to_live |
| PRO+ Development placement | 1 | future placements returned to PRO after review | move_to_live |
| PRO drawdown model | 1 | would prefer end-of-day drawdown | trading |
| PRO intraday drawdown on unrealized profits | 1 | prefers end-of-day drawdown | trading |
| Rule 6 opposite positions across accounts | 1 | accounts permanently closed after wrong-account order corrected in 54 seconds | trading |
| shared connections and equipment between father and son | 1 | accounts blocked on suspicion of cheating | trading |
| trailing drawdown | 1 | repeated account losses | trading |
| trailing drawdown and prolonged account holds | 1 | general criticism without a personal incident | trading |
| trailing drawdown from order on inaccessible account | 1 | funded account hit drawdown; relief refused | trading |
| unspecified changes over recent months | 1 | Not consistently stated. | Not consistently stated. |
This section looks at what happened to the customers who needed help.
180 reviews involved support.
Support outcomes
Positive 86.1%, Negative 11.1%, Mixed 2.8%, Not Stated 0.0%
Human support gets detailed praise for refunds, credits, connection fixes and explanations. The complaints are escalations nobody answers, technical reviews that dismiss the trader, and not being able to get past the chatbot. Both are real; they are different kinds of interaction.
Helped
Did not help
Chosen for how much they explain, whether positive or negative. Each one says why it was picked.
My first payout from TPT. Very fast.
Why this review is included: Explicit first-payout experience rather than generic praise.
What it supports: Successful first withdrawal with unspecified fast timing.
Read the review at the sourceAmazing company! I get paid every single day.
Why this review is included: Describes repeated personal receipts.
What it supports: Repeat payout experience.
Read the review at the sourceI got my daily payout 3 times this week.
Why this review is included: Concrete repeated-payout claim.
What it supports: Recurring access to payouts.
Read the review at the sourceTook my First Payout. It was there in minutes.
Why this review is included: Connects first payout with receipt timing.
What it supports: Rapid first-payout receipt.
Read the review at the sourceThe same firm can be easy to buy from and hard to get paid by. Splitting reviews by stage keeps that visible.
11.6% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
12.5% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
11.9% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
0.3% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
22.8% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
28.9% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
4.2% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
36.7% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
Monthly figures from the same review analysis.
| Month | Review volume |
|---|---|
| Jul 26 | 284 |
| Aug 26 | 311 |
Reviews in this month
311
+9.5%vs July 2026
Average rating
4.55 out of 54.55
+0.39 points vs July 2026
311 reviews, grouped by star rating.
Shares are of this month’s total review count.
No issue mentioned
Of detailed experiences
Mentioned an issue
Of detailed experiences
Where reviewers said what happened next. Silence is counted as unknown, not as unresolved.
How incidents ended
Resolved 27.7%, Compensated 24.5%, Not Stated 23.4%, Unresolved 21.3%, Partial 3.2%
Detail is what makes a review checkable, so it is measured rather than assumed.
Daily review counts for the selected month.
August
| M | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | ||||||
| F | ||||||
Hover or tap a day for the number of reviews posted.
One busier review day, no shared cause
One day drew more reviews than the rest. They cover payouts, support, discounts, verification and technical problems, with nothing pointing to a common cause or coordinated activity.
Payouts
Money arrives fast, and humans actually help
Friction
Missing credits, stale dashboards, activation waits
The risk
Accounts closed and PRO+ transfers disputed
Evidence
Trader reports, not verified payment records
Patterns in reviewers’ experiences.
Positive themesMost relevant to traders who want frequent access to profits, a separate wallet and hands-on help with routine account administration. Traders who found the rules clear and passed the evaluation describe a workable route into funded trading.
Recurring concernsBe careful if you trade several accounts, if intraday drawdown would catch you, if you are outside the US and depend on a particular withdrawal method, or if a PRO+ placement or a slow activation would derail your plans. Nothing here shows that a disputed technical event gets put right.
Scores out of 10 · August 2026
Satisfaction
9.1/ 10
Published feedback is broadly favorable: detailed praise, plus a smaller set of critical accounts that carry real consequences.
Trust
5.6/ 10
Money received and problems corrected earn trust; disputed closures and forfeited profits stop that trust from being unconditional.
Payouts
8.8/ 10
Speed and convenience are well evidenced. Universal receipt, audited amounts and guaranteed timing are not.
Support
8.8/ 10
Routine administrative help is a genuine strength. Escalation is where it falls apart.
Rules
6.6/ 10
The rules read clearly, but understanding them does not stop disputes about enforcement or about where an account ends up.
Overall
7.8/ 10
Good for everyday use, with real caution around transitions, platform-loss claims and account restrictions.